|
The new left is up in arms and down in the legs over ABC's
Docu drama "the path to 9/11. As I see it, they have two issues here.
Firstly that the movie holds their favorite fornicator accountable and
secondly they are mad because the movie makes them look as if they do not
take the war on terror seriously.
They don't.
The Daily KOS. The
leaders of the tin foil hat movement have a poll where one can vote on
what you think is more of a threat. Terror or big corporations. 70% say
big corporations. This may explain why the Democrats plan for the war on
terror is to invade Wal-Mart.
A quick tour through the bowels of the
left blogsphere quickly produced gold.
That "Fear" thing you've been peddling for the past five
years? Over with. Done. That is, like, sooo 20 minutes ago. Pre-9/12
mindset, and all that. That Dog Don't Hunt. That ship has sailed. It's not
playing in Peoria. You might be sellin', but we're not buyin'.
They're telling you scary campfire stories so you'll cower
in your tent all night instead of coming out to see how beautiful the
stars are, and to listen to the quiet of the forest.
What do they think - we're kids at a magic show or
something, f'cryin' out loud? "Ooh, Look over here! No, no! - not over
there - over here, over HERE! Ooh, look, here's a BOOGEYMAN!"
How these people can watch the news (I know the news is
controled by the right wing conspiracy) and see all that has happened in
recent years, attempts do destroy America and make statements like these
is mindboggling. How can sane people think otherwise?
This latest
episode of hysterical Liberal hysteria is what sets Conservatives apart
from them. You don't see many on the right crying about what is said about
us. According to hysterical Liberals Conservatives are racist, fear
mongerers, isolationist and imperialists. We except that. that is how they
debate. They call us names. There has been enough anti Conservative press
about us over the years but it's the nature of the beast. Yet if anyone
dares say something negative about the fanciful fornicator they go even
more hysterical than usual. Senate Democrats have the arrogance to ask a
network to not broadcast a movie that spent millions on just because it
tells the truth.
So much for freedom of speech. But would you expect
anything less from Ried, Stabenow, Schumer and Dorgan?
So where is the
problem? Clinton admitted in 2002 he passed up Bin Laden and it wasn't
until 1999 he actually began mulling options to get him. this is after the
man had already attacked us on our soil.
Why can't ABC show
this?
Why can't a former Clinton advisor (Mansoor Ijaz) who actually
negotiated with Sudan on behalf of Clinton from 1996 to 1998 tell the
truth. Why can't he tell us what we already know that Clinton passed up
many chance to get Bin Laden. ”The silence of the Clinton administration
in responding to these offers was deafening." According to Ijaz.
So the
Democrats now vow to retaliate with a threat to pull ABC's license. Nice.
Even with the 9/11 commission head as a consultant the Democrats can still
claim foul play. Nothing unusual really. that is how Democrats work. Their
biggest fear is the American people finding out who they really are. When
was the last time a Democrat ran on true Democrat ideals?
Where was the
outrage when the cousin to the Cape Cod Okra, Michael Moore released
faranhieght 9/11? A movie that was immediately proven to be factually
derelict. That was okay because it blamed Bush for everything and many of
the hysterical liberals still believe what Michael Moore says is gospel.
That is what we doctors call desperation.
What else would you expect
from a man you directed his national security adviser, Sandy Berger to
stuff classified documents down his pants?
Clinton obviously didn't
understand the threats we have and the new left still hasn't a clue. As
long as they want to discuss things with those who believe their sole
purpose in this world is to kill non Muslims they will never get
it.
-Bert
|