MEDIA BIAS? WHAT MEDIA BIAS?

 

So George Bush's popularity has plummeted to 34%. This has been splashed all over the internet. A CBS poll has shown that George Bush's popularity is now at an all time low and I have received countless emails from liberals trumpeting this great news. I quickly rushed to the bookcase and retrieved my copy of the constitution to see if their had been an amendment allowing George Bush to run for a third term. I found nothing to suggest that this was the case and I settled down to breakfast. Within two hours another story had begun to make it's way around the net that the CBS poll was stacked against the president. At the very bottom of the poll is the break down....

"Total Republicans" contacted: 272 unweighted and 289 weighted.

"Total Democrats" contacted: 409 unweighted and 381 weighted.

"Total Independents" contacted: 337 unweighted and 348 weighted.

http://newsbusters.org/node/4211

This of course did not surprise me but I have to say that their stupidity and desperation is intriguing. How could they think that no one would question a poll that comes in at 34% when the most recent cook poll has Bush at 40%, Rasmussen has Bush at 43% and the Average is 40.4% ? A slight anomaly? The CBS poll was between 6 and 9 percentage points off every other poll. What is interesting is that the liberal forums continue to claim that the conservatives control the mainstream media. There's Bob Schiefer claiming "There is little to celebrate at the White House where public dissatisfaction, that began with the handling of Hurricane Katrina, has driven President Bush's approval ratings to an all-time low of 34 percent." and yet he never bothered to tell the three viewers CBS has left that the poll favored Democrats. Bias? Of course not. Does CBS actually think anyone trusts them after Memogate? Dan Rather agreed to float forged documents in an attempt to derail George Bush's presidential campaign. Aside from that fact the program found nothing wrong with running a story without first checking the facts and the veracity of the charges. Bias? Of course not!
The Dick Cheney episode was case in point. The UAE port deal which is now getting so much scrutiny was ignored for a week because Dick Cheney was involved in a hunting accident. First he was eviscerated for not telling the mainstream media and then he was butchered yet again for going public but doing it with FOX News. CNN's Jack Cafferty said this: ""It didn’t exactly represent a profile in courage for the Vice President to wander over there to the F-word network for a sit-down with Brit Hume. I mean, that’s a little like Bonnie interviewing Clyde, ain’t it?...I mean, running over there to the Fox network to, I mean, that’s — talk about seeking a safe haven. He’s not going to get any high hard ones from anybody at the F-word network. I think we know that.".

http://www.mrc.org/notablequotables/2006/nq20060227.asp

I think this is the first time I have heard one network tear apart another. Is anyone surprised that CNN is falling apart? Wait. Isn't this the same network that broadcast an 'X' over Cheney's face? And isn't this the same network that aired a commercial linking John Roberts to abortion bombings? Media bias? What media bias?
-Bert